One assay to test them all: Multiplex assays for expansion of respiratory virus surveillance.

Molecular multiplex assays (MPAs) for simultaneous detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in a single RT-PCR reaction reduce time and increase efficiency to identify multiple pathogens with overlapping clinical presentation but different treatments or public health implications. Clinical performance of XpertXpress® SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV (Cepheid, GX), TaqPath™ COVID-19, FluA/B, RSV Combo kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, TP), and PowerChek™ SARS-CoV-2/Influenza A&B/RSV Multiplex RT-PCR kit II (KogeneBiotech, PC) was compared to individual Standards of Care (SoC). Thirteen isolates of SARS-CoV-2, human seasonal influenza, and avian influenza served to assess limit of detection (LoD). Then, positive and negative residual nasopharyngeal specimens, collected under public health surveillance and pandemic response served for evaluation. Subsequently, comparison of effectiveness was assessed. The three MPAs confidently detect all lineages of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. MPA-LoDs vary from 1 to 2 Log10 differences from SoC depending on assay and strain. Clinical evaluation resulted in overall agreement between 97 and 100%, demonstrating a high accuracy to detect all targets. Existing differences in costs, testing burden and implementation constraints influence the choice in primary or community settings. TP, PC and GX, reliably detect SARS-CoV-2, influenza and RSV simultaneously, with reduced time-to-results and simplified workflows. MPAs have the potential to enhance diagnostics, surveillance system, and epidemic response to drive policy on prevention and control of viral respiratory infections.

Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance during the Pandemic-Endemic Transition Using PCR-Based Genotyping Assays.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) pose an increased risk to public health due to higher transmissibility and/or immune escape. In this study, we assessed the performance of a custom TaqMan SARS-CoV-2 mutation panel consisting of 10 selected real-time PCR (RT-PCR) genotyping assays compared to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for identification of 5 VOC circulating in The Netherlands. SARS-CoV-2 positive samples (N = 664), collected during routine PCR screening (15 ≤ CT ≤ 32) between May-July 2021 and December 2021-January 2022, were selected and analyzed using the RT-PCR genotyping assays. VOC lineage was determined based on the detected mutation profile. In parallel, all samples underwent WGS with the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 research panel. Among 664 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, the RT-PCR genotyping assays classified 31.2% as Alpha (N = 207); 48.9% as Delta (N = 325); 19.4% as Omicron (N = 129), 0.3% as Beta (N = 2), and 1 sample as a non-VOC. Matching results were obtained using WGS in 100% of the samples. RT-PCR genotyping assays enable accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 VOC. Furthermore, they are easily implementable, and the costs and turnaround time are significantly reduced compared to WGS. For this reason, a higher proportion of SARS-CoV-2 positive cases in the VOC surveillance testing can be included, while reserving valuable WGS resources for identification of new variants. Therefore, RT-PCR genotyping assays would be a powerful method to include in SARS-CoV-2 surveillance testing. IMPORTANCE The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome changes constantly. It is estimated that there are thousands of variants of SARS-CoV-2 by now. Some of those variants, variants of concern (VOC), pose an increased risk to public health due to higher transmissibility and/or immune escape. Pathogen surveillance helps researchers, epidemiologists, and public health officials to monitor the evolution of infectious diseases agents, alert on the spread of pathogens, and develop counter measures like vaccines. The technique used for the pathogen surveillance is called sequence analysis which makes it possible to examine the building blocks of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, a new PCR method based on the detection of specific changes of those building blocks is presented. This method enables a fast, accurate and cheap determination of different SARS-CoV-2 VOC. Therefore, it would be a powerful method to include in SARS-CoV-2 surveillance testing.

Clinical Performance of Direct RT-PCR Testing of Raw Saliva for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.

RT-PCR tests based on RNA extraction from nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) are promoted as the "gold standard" for SARS-CoV-2 detection. However, the use of saliva samples offers noninvasive self-collection more suitable for high-throughput testing. This study evaluated performance of the TaqPath COVID-19 Fast PCR Combo kit 2.0 assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw saliva relative to a lab-developed direct RT-PCR test (SalivaDirect-based PCR, SDB-PCR) and an RT-PCR test based on RNA extraction from NPS. Saliva and NPS samples were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (N = 615). Saliva samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using the TaqPath COVID-19 Fast PCR Combo kit 2.0 and the SDB-PCR, while NPS samples were tested by RT-PCR in RNA extracts according to the Irish national testing system. TaqPath COVID-19 Fast PCR Combo kit 2.0 detected SARS-CoV-2 in 52 saliva samples, of which 51 were also positive with the SDB-PCR. Compared to the NPS "gold standard" biospecimen method, 49 samples displayed concordant results, while three samples (35

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern surveillance including Omicron using RT-PCR-based genotyping offers comparable performance to whole genome sequencing.

Known SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) can be detected and differentiated using an RT-PCR-based genotyping approach, which offers quicker time to result, lower cost, higher flexibility, and use of the same laboratory instrumentation for detection of SARS-CoV-2 when compared with whole genome sequencing (WGS). In the current study, we demonstrate how we applied a genotyping approach for identification of all VOCs and that such technique can offer comparable performance to WGS for identification of known SARS-CoV-2 VOCs, including more recent strains, Omicron BA.1 and BA.2.